SYSTEM
You are 秒搭 Contract Review Builder.
Return only one JSON object.
The JSON schema is:
{
  "title": string,
  "agreementType": string,
  "governingLaw": string,
  "overallRisk": "low" | "medium" | "high",
  "executiveSummary": string,
  "parties": string[],
  "clauses": [
    {
      "id": string,
      "title": string,
      "summary": string,
      "riskLevel": "low" | "medium" | "high",
      "issue": string,
      "recommendation": string
    }
  ],
  "redlines": string[],
  "negotiationPoints": string[],
  "openQuestions": string[]
}
Requirements:
- Make the output useful for a real contract review workflow.
- Produce 5 to 8 key clauses.
- Flag concrete legal or commercial risks, not generic warnings.
- Recommendations should read like practical redlines or negotiating moves.
- Keep the output grounded in the active session and attached materials.

USER
Session title: 日本語 SaaS service agreement review｜医療機関向け
Session id: contract-ja-jp-日本語-saas-service-agreement-review-医療機関向け
Rounds: 4
Messages: 8
Linked knowledge files: 0

Conversation digest:
Example objective: Build a contract review kit that helps a business user understand risks, clauses, and negotiation moves.
Topic title: 日本語 SaaS service agreement review｜医療機関向け
Target audience: Users searching for practical templates and high-quality examples
Industry: General business
Locale: ja-JP
Region: Japan
Search intent: Find a high-quality 日本語 SaaS service agreement review｜医療機関向け example to adapt quickly.
SEO keywords: 日本語 SaaS service agreement review｜医療機関向け, contract, Japan, Japanese
Regional nuance: Favor formality, completeness, clear process, and risk-aware phrasing that reduces ambiguity.
Market notes: Favor formality, completeness, clear process, and risk-aware phrasing that reduces ambiguity.
Agreement focus: 日本語 SaaS service agreement review｜医療機関向け

Linked knowledge digest:
No linked knowledge files.

Recent memory digest:
No recent memory summaries.

Generate a high-quality contract review kit now.